If You’re A Shorter Man, Both Political Parties Hate You

Kofi Otunde
Member
Kofi Otunde
Cadet
Height: 5'7
Location: Bronx, United States
Joined: Jan 20, 2025
Posts: 8
Reactions: 0
Score: 2 | 0
LowerViewCa$h: 9

Offline

Politics
If You’re A Shorter Man, Both Political Parties Hate You
post #1

Full disclosure, from the time I was about eighteen years old, with my little understanding of politics at that time (I am forty-five today), I made a conscious decision to declare myself center of the aisle. In other words, straight-down-the-middle-independent. At that time, nearing the end of the Clinton administration with all of its controversies (which seem tame considering today’s mess), I knew that there were some positions that I firmly agreed with liberals on, and some things that deep in my bones, I ran staunchly conservative. This mindset obviously affected my voting habits. I could not align with any particular political party. If a candidate ran and promoted policy which connected with my beliefs, then that’s the person I voted for. Many times, I’d vote third party. To provide more context, I am also an American black man with immigrant and mixed-race roots. No this does not make me special in any way, but I want to add transparency and context (my family held conservative ideals, but were often put-off and ultimately didn’t vote for politicians who held beliefs antithetical to their own).

See Also: Don't Be That Guy. Personality Traits Shorter Men Should Avoid

So with this, I paid particular attention to the fairly recent exchange between AOC and Steven Miller. These are two people that I do not particularly care for, and it has much to do with both of their personalities, public gaffes as it does with some of their policy positions. To be clear, I’m not saying that they’re all the way horrible, or ignoring how much they mean to their constituents, but with each blunder, I find it harder to cringe without creating dozens of new wrinkles (and lord knows I have enough of those).

INTRODUCTION

If you’ve been under a boulder for the last few months and are oblivious to their verbal sparring last fall (October 2025), Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, former bartender and New York metro area suburbanite turned congresswoman, and former White House aide Stephen Miller traded jabs, with AOC starting off by calling him a clown, accusing him of insecure masculinity, mocking him for being 4’10” (though he responded that he is a foot taller than that, not that it matters), and urging her followers to laugh at him. Miller quickly fired back in a Fox News interview, saying, “her brain didn’t work” and called her a “trainwreck.” Letting the retort roll off of her back, Ocasio-Cortez later tweeted her amused disbelief that the news host made him watch the clip, which commenced the back-and-forth.

Now seriously, the ad hominem attacks were nothing short of sophomoric and beneath both of them, especially considering their prestigious educations, influential positions, national recognition, and tendency to present themselves as operating on higher moral ground when it comes to their core beliefs. Stephen Miller, who is of Ashkenazi Jewish descent, attended Duke University, majored in political science, and became a leader in the school’s Conservative Union. After graduating, he advanced hardline anti-immigration positions early in his political career, later drawing scrutiny for promoting material linked to white nationalist sources. By contrast, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a Bronx native of Puerto Rican descent, attended Boston University, where she majored in international relations and economics. She interned for Ted Kennedy, directly assisting Spanish-speaking constituents with foreign relations and immigration issues, then went on to work on Bernie Sanders’ 2016 presidential campaign before running for Congress. She has become a prominent advocate for civil rights, supports more permissive immigration policies, and maintains a strong pro–working-class stance.

It's not surprising then, based on their histories, even without paying attention to their current political stances, that they are where they are, and where they wanted to be. So with that, is it really surprising when someone like Steve Miller said on a Fox News show that “we have people from all over the world that on their own, would’ve never invented the wheel….” when discussing migrants in the context of birthright citizenship, or when he called white protesters “stupid white hippies” at a rally against the National Guard troops called in by the federal government to crack down on crime in Washington, D.C.? My answer, at least, would be no, because at least in this era, many of his supporters and colleagues are saying exactly what’s on their mind and don’t try to hide it.

By contrast, I remember watching a video of Ocasio-Cortez at a National Action Network event in New York back in 2019 where she was speaking to a crowd of civil rights activists. During her speech there, her speaking style changed dramatically, taking on this “Southern drawl” filled with urban slang. “This is what organizing looks ‘lah-ike’…” she said, clapping her hands, and then later, “Proud to be a ‘bartendah’... ain’t nothing wrong with ‘thaaat’.” I couldn’t do anything but cringe. Five years later, she pulled a similar stunt at a DNC speech where she appeared to mimic a Baptist church minister in her delivery. Ugh.

Now you may consider my observations of AOC to be a nothing-burger. This is not an indictment of AOC, but these observations made me sink into my chair. It’s like there’s something hidden beneath, maybe even subliminally (in an implicit bias sort of way), in how she may view certain groups. At those events, her words were simplified and dumbed down, giving off the message that she was speaking to a “less intelligent crowd.” Does she herself believe this? I’m not suggesting she does—I’m not in her head—but that was the impression. You see, it’s almost as if there’s this palpable fakeness that makes me unsettled (and others too, apparently, as there was plenty of online commentary). I am no fan of Stephen Miller either (mostly because of how he presents himself and his fiery, Dr. Evil-like rants and talking over TV hosts when he’s invited onto television programs), but when it comes to him and people who move like him, what you see is essentially what you get. Make sense? There’s really no surprise when they say controversial things. This is why the exchange over height motivated me to write this article. I’ve frequently heard in person and read in online communities as to why the “left is better for shorter guys,” or why “short men should vote conservative.” The idea of any particular party being a better fit for our short brethren is just laughable on its face (seriously, lol). With that, let’s dig into why “If you’re a shorter man, both parties hate you.” 🙂

FRIENDS UNTIL THEY'RE NOT

Back in 2024, my YouTube algorithm pulled up a show called “The PBD Podcast.” The host, Patrick Bet David, whose initial success was multi-level insurance marketing, ended up building this show which became one of the most watched conservative platforms in the world. Regularly pushing conservative messaging and dissecting perceived detrimental policies by Democratic politicians, he made it a point to bring on and support Republican candidates. Fine, that’s what his platform is supposed to do. When Florida Governor Ron DeSantis was in the running with then-former President Donald Trump, it’s what Bet-David did on his podcast that made me (who isn’t a DeSantis fan) want to restart my Android phone. PBD brought out a pair of new shoes and asked DeSantis to try them on as a challenge to the public mocking him for being shorter than he claimed to be. “So what?” I thought. What a waste of time. With the issues pressing Americans at the time, and the clock running out until the election, this is what he wanted to talk about? I thought his platform was supposed to support his conservative base—never mind the fact that the PBD podcast is based in Miami. Go figure.

In December of 2025, during a very public falling out between conservative darlings Ben Shapiro and Candace Owens, who worked together at The Daily Wire, Owens, who had previously defended her colleague vehemently, said in anger, “Ben Shapiro, [expletive] you and the midget horse that you rode in on.” What? When I thought of the years invested by Owens into The Daily Wire and the amount of animus she dealt with from African American detractors (which is important, because plenty of conjecture suggested she was being “used,” which Owens herself later confirmed on her own show with guest Ana Kasparian), height was her go-to? Never mind their rift as it related to support for Israel (which became a hotter national topic in U.S. political circles than it had been in previous years), never Shapiro’s accusation that Owens was being antisemitic—the final straw was height. Shapiro, by the way, claims to be 5’9”. Commenters on many social platforms dispute that claim, suggesting he is somewhere in between 5’4” and 5’7”. None of this matters, though. According to Owens, he’s a “midget,” with a horse, of course (sorry, couldn’t resist).

Then there’s “The Don” himself. During the 2024 campaign, then-candidate Donald Trump repeatedly mocked shorter candidates. One example was “Little Marco” (Marco Rubio, who is now his secretary of state). Another example—back in the 2020 campaign—there was “Little Mike” (former three-term mayor of New York City Michael Bloomberg, who ran for president). Two men who had very successful careers before running for president were now reduced to “little men” – to the point where their height was just as much of a topic of conversation as their policies. It didn’t stop there, though. There was “Liddle Bob Corker,” back in 2017, whom Trump reportedly considered “too short” to serve as Secretary of State, and two years later, via a tweet, there was “Liddle Adam Schiff!” (Democratic congressman from California). Again, go figure.

See Also: Making The Napoleon Complex Work For You

TURNING LEFT

The other side of the aisle ain’t exactly sanitized. A few months ago, I was watching YouTube political commentator The Amazing Lucas disparage controversial white supremacist-adjacent political commentator Nick Fuentes in a retort, repeatedly referring to him as short as a means to insult him. The emphasis on the “Sh” of “Short” was all I needed to hear. Likewise, progressive Democratic political commentator and Twitch streamer Hasan Piker also decided to take a jab at Fuentes in October 2025 by calling him a “booger eating [expletive] manlet

“ in response to Fuentes calling him out on one of his broadcasts. Look, I am no fan of, nor have any sympathy for Fuentes, especially after being exposed to some of his racial rants and views on women’s “place” in society on various social media platforms (and even legacy media has been platforming him as of late, which is pretty dreadful), but even having that bias and revulsion toward the guy, using height as the punchline, to point it out as if it were some kind of defect (versus his many character flaws and extreme viewpoints) is completely unnecessary.

And back to Mr. Ron DeSantis. California Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom, who like Trump, stands at 6’3”, also felt the need to chime in on DeSantis’s boot-wearing saga by stating back in December of 2023—“Hopefully for Ron, it’s a seated debate so he won’t have to mash his foot into his high heels to look taller. But if not, he’ll definitely be on a twelve-inch step stool so he can peek right above the podium.” This, from the same man who in his inaugural address said, “compassion and empathy are the human connections that make shared burdens easier to bear” when describing a “California for all”. You don’t say? Focusing on someone else we spoke about earlier, Mr. Michael Bloomberg, back in 2020, Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren quipped, "I want to talk specifically for just a minute at the top about a thread that is coming our way. And it's a big threat — not a tall one, but a big one: Michael Bloomberg." Her campaign raised five million dollars shortly thereafter. While I’m sure the successful fundraising wasn’t directly tied to the joke, it seems mocking height is good for business.

ANOTHER NOTE

Going back to something I discussed earlier about subconsciously hierarchizing groups, I want to point out something I’ve noticed. Take a look at all of these couples below. Do you recognize something? Whether intentional or not—and I am not trying to denigrate anyone because of their dating choices—do you notice how all of these politicians have been paired with white men? According to the CDC, non-Hispanic white men have the highest mean height among the racial groups measured in the United States. At the same time, whiteness has historically been perceived as occupying a higher position in the social hierarchy in Western society, particularly in the United States. Are all of these couplings intentional? Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, the congresswoman who we started off this article with, recently broke off her engagement with longtime partner Riley Roberts (in fact, they go all the way back to Boston University). He also happens to be white (nothing wrong with that). He’s also significantly taller than his Bronx-born ex-fiancée, who stands nearly six feet tall. Ilhan Omar left her ex-husband, who was near her height in late 2019, and ended up with a much taller man, who just happened to be white. She was alleged to have had an affair with Tim Mynett, a political consultant, earlier that year. How about Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson? Her husband is a prominent gastrointestinal and general surgeon. Both are highly accomplished professionals. She’s 5’1”. While there is no public record of Dr. Jackson’s height, when standing in photos, there is a stark height difference. Then there’s former vice president Kamala Harris. She, of Indian and Afro-Jamaican descent, stands at 5’4”. Her husband? Doug Emhoff, also of European descent, stands at 6’2”.

On the right, we have Candace Owens, 5’6”. Her husband, British businessman George Farmer, clocks in at close to 6 feet. A six-inch difference, but he certainly isn’t 5’8”. Vice-President J.D. Vance has been criticized for making statements that were anti-inclusive. His wife, Usha Vance, of Indian descent, doesn’t seem to mind, at least from my point of view, as their marriage is going strong. She married a man who has Scots-Irish roots and stands at 6’2”. She is an accomplished corporate litigator and Yale Law graduate. Then there’s former governor of South Carolina Nikki Haley (née Nimrata Haley). Like Usha Vance, Haley is also of Indian descent. The 5’4” politician is married to American businessman Michael Haley. He stands at 5’11”—close enough to tall.

To once again clarify, I have zero issues with interracial dating and couples with a significant height gap. I personally date women I find attractive—race isn’t a factor. Date and marry who you want, it’s no sweat off of my back. However, some people publicly advocate for marginalized groups, while others publicly advocate policies that may marginalize certain groups. Yet neither group’s private dating choices necessarily seem to follow the racial or social divisions present in their political rhetoric. Are all of these pairings coincidences? Now, of course, my observations do not prove anything about their motivations—I’m not in their heads. One could argue that moving up the corporate ladder will put you in proximity to the majority. That’s a fair take. On the other hand, it is interesting that the women in this particular group all happen to be paired with men who just happen to belong to the group with the highest average male height. Go figure.

Advertise With The Lower View And Reach 100,000+ Per Month!

CONCLUSION

When I’ve come across comments online from fellow shorter men, who in many cases, naively insist that one party is aligned better with shorter men’s (read: “men’s”) interests, it’s always preceded with some idea that the ideology or values of one party are better for the quality of life for us compact gents, which just makes me chuckle (a lot). It’s like, “listen to the words that are coming out of their mouth, dude!” That’s all that matters. While a lot of talk in political spaces can be classified as “theater,” I’m more inclined to believe that off-the-cuff commentary that a person may feel is “safe” to say closely connects to their own personal beliefs. And as we’ve seen in these many examples, it is not exclusive to one party, nor is it more prevalent in one or the other. This is not a party thing, but rather an aspect of the human condition—the belief in or subconscious practice of following and upholding the perceived social hierarchy.

Now to be clear, the title I gave this article, “If You’re a Shorter Man, Both Political Parties Hate You” was intended to be tongue-in-cheek. I am not suggesting that every member of these political parties literally hates you (lol)—that would be absurd—rather, that the same social animus that exists around the very idea of a man being short does not suddenly disappear because we’re talking politics—the same as it doesn’t go away in corporate settings, medicine, or blue-collar professions. Heightism is everywhere. It doesn’t take a break, it doesn’t disappear because we’re suddenly “older” or because it’s the “21st century.”

So if you’re going to vote for any political party, vote for the candidate of your choice because that’s who you like and who you feel will deliver on whatever policies are important to you. Don’t think for a second that they’re more “pro-short guys” than the opposition (which is a ridiculous thing to even think about)… Because when they open their mouths at just the wrong time… you might end up caught off guard (or if you’re like me, hardly at all). Do you think I’m wrong? Challenge me! I dare you! Join us and let us know your thoughts on our forum, here at… The Lower View. Thanks for reading!

Like This Article? Chat About It And More On Our Forum For Short Men!

CorporateGuy
Member
CorporateGuy
Short Knight
Height: 5'6
Location: Brooklyn, United States
Joined: Apr 16, 2014
Posts: 118
Reactions: 55
Score: 16 | 1
LowerViewCa$h: 81

Offline

Re: If You’re A Shorter Man, Both Political Parties Hate You
post #2

No truer words have been spoken.

Even James Madison was ripped by Federalists over his stature. 

thepostman
Member
thepostman
Short Vassal
Height: 5'6
Location: Chelsea, United States
Joined: Oct 30, 2020
Posts: 50
Reactions: 4
Score: 18 | 0
LowerViewCa$h: 52

Offline

Re: If You’re A Shorter Man, Both Political Parties Hate You
post #3

AOC has always made me cringe, but I didn't find her completely unlikeable... until that comment. It was so disappointing, but then again, not surprising.

SIMILAR THREADS REPLIES VIEWS
LAST POST
Fall Boot Guide For Shorter Men

Wow, just wow! Temperatures finally hit the sixty-degree mark for a few consecutive days here in the concrete jungle known as the City Of New York for the first time in months, and I’m seeing some brave heroines adorn some sleek knee-high boots along with longer shirts and ripped jeans, click-clacking their way across crowded crosswalks in both midtown Manhattan and Downtown Brooklyn. All of these things combined with the sun positioned almost directly over the equator must mean one thing—Fall is near! In fact, it really is! In just a few days, Summer will be officially gone! For us shorter men, this means those low-tops, flip-flops and no-show socks are about to be shelved for the next six months or so (along with those white sneakers – you know the supposed “no white footwear after Labor Day” rule). Boots must make their way to the front! Otherwise, we’ll be cleaning leaf slime from our sneaker soles. To prepare for the coming gorgeous peak foliage, we’ve decided to compile a boot guide just in time for the pumpkin spice and apple-picking. Without further delay (come on and take in some of those images we just spoke about, don’t be a boring Bob!), gentleman, welcome to the Fall Boot Guide for Shorter Men.

 

A Fall Back Into History


Fall boots, like our brief overview of Winter Boots in our Winter Boot Guide, evolved across centuries from rugged necessity into the polished fashion staples we know of today. Originally designed for foot protection during hunting, horseback riding (try doing that in Sandals!) and military service, boots were built for battle-tough utility. By the 1800s, however, they became refined for both formal and semi-formal wear, especially in Europe and North America.
 

Gentlemen in Victorian Britain popularized Balmoral boots—sleek lace-ups named after Balmoral Castle, while the Chelsea boot, with its elastic sides, rose to popularity. In the 1900s, work boots like moc-toe wedge styles transitioned from factory floors to casual and dress casual fashion, while harness boots pointed toward a rebellious spirit via a growing motorcycle culture. Yeah, “Bad-To-The-Bone” (think of every guy you’ve ever seen annoyingly revving their motorcycle engine on the highway next to your car, or worse yet, at three-o-clock in the morning up a hill in your neighborhood).

 

These days, boots strike a balance: practical enough for the fall weather, yet stylish enough to pair with jeans, chinos, or even suits if done right. For us shorter men, we also get to enjoy a very modest lift since most boots have a slight heel, or at the very least, a pretty thick sole to hold up to the elements while remaining functional.

 

Fall Boot Types Every Man Should Know

 

Chelsea Boot

The Chelsea boot is minimalism at its best. Defined by its elastic side panels and pull-on tabs, it’s sleek, versatile, and ankle-skimming. Black or brown leather or suede Chelseas pair effortlessly with slim trousers or dark denim, making them a go-to for those who want clean lines without visual bulk. Dressy in appearance, they add just enough formality to make you look like you’re going somewhere special.

Examples: Red Wing, Thursday Boot Company, Blundstone, Call It Spring, Morjas

 

2. Balmoral Boot

The Balmoral is the embodiment of formality. It features closed lacing, often in polished leather, with a seamless look that complements tailored suits and well-fitted chinos. Because of its slim profile, it commands attention without widening the foot. For those aiming for a pairing with denim, add a simple cuff for businessman-on-the-weekend or entrepreneur vibes. Add a cardigan and scarf, and you’re ready to take over the world, or at least a trip on Fifth Avenue.

Examples: Allen Edmonds, Beckett Simonon, Carmina, Cobbler Union, Aldo

 

Chukka Boot

This funny-sounding boot (at least to me—I laugh just saying it) gets its name from the sport of polo, where chukka refers to a period of play. Casual but refined, chukkas typically feature two or three eyelets and hit just above the ankle. Suede chukkas in earth tones are perfect for fall weekends, while leather versions can transition into business casual settings. They’re high enough to qualify as a boot, but low enough to retain a shoe-like appearance. If they’re good enough for Lenny Kravitz (we published an article on his style choices some time ago), then they’re good enough for the everyday guy who wants to exude a bit of humble hipness on a cool breezy day walking around downtown.

Examples: Clarks, Padmore & Barnes, John Lobb, Astor Flex, DSW

 

Captoe Dress Boot

My absolute favorite boot because they can be paired with just about anything and can even make a casual outfit look more than casual. I am being a bit biased because I love captoe shoes, so then what better way than to get the best of both worlds (boots and shoes) and make any ensemble look spectacular? With a horizontal stitching line across the toe, captoe boots strike the balance between formal and everyday wear. Black versions work well with suits, while brown versions transition easily into smart-casual outfits. Rather wear denim? With a nice solid or plaid button down, cardigan or v-neck sweater and leather jacket, add shoe polish and you’ll look like you own something or are about to own something. From the Upper West Side to the Upper East Side, you’ll look like you belong when you slip into some captoes.

 

Oxford & Wingtip Boots

As the name implies, these resemble oxford shoes, making them easy to pair with formal or dress-casual ensembles. Oxfords got their start from students in 1800s England, who wore half-boots with side slits called “Oxonians” rather than the stiff knee-high boots of the day. Plain Oxford boots do not have stitched cap toes, so have a plainer appearance. Wingtip boots, on the other hand, feature a W-shaped toe cap along with perforations around the tip and sides of the boot like their Wingtip shoe counterparts. Those perforations add nice accents and style to what would otherwise be a plain affair, and as a bonus, provide a bit of ventilation. Just for clarity, Wingtip and Oxford boots can also be cap toes, which means these classifications can overlap. While I personally would rather wear wingtip shoes than wingtip boots, their existence provides more options for those who want formal aesthetics with cooler weather functionality. In my book, they are perfect to pair with darker jeans, button-downs and double-breasted cardigans—a dress-casual gentleman’s delight.

 

Harness Boots

Get ready for the ride, because that’s where these boots originated. Gaining popularity in motorcycle culture, its straps and rings lend a rugged and rebellious feel, making it a great statement piece for casual outfits—think “Uncle Jesse” from Full House (or you can always watch “Fuller House” if you’re not interested in time traveling to the past). These are not boots that you’d want to wear to the eight o’clock meeting in the office, but they would look great on a night out to the bar or brewery, for a stroll on your typical fall Saturday afternoon or to your favorite classic rock concert. Think jeans, think a leather or suede jacket and your favorite flannel or button-down shirt. If you’re into studs on your outerwear, you can lean into your inner “Uncle Jesse”—I think John Stamos might approve.

 

 

Moc-Toe Wedge Boot

 

In my opinion, these are your “fall classics”. If you’re an older millennial or younger gen-xer, the mid-‘90s “Eastlands” craze will bring back some fond memories (or if you couldn’t afford them like me, then those Payless knockoffs might invoke the same feeling lol). Moc-toe wedge boots are generally built for durability and comfort, with a moccasin-style and thick rubber sole. Traditionally a work boot, they have crossed into streetwear and casual fashion, pairing best with raw denim or flannel layers. Opting for higher quality leather exteriors with a nice thick sole can have you feeling like you’re walking on air, especially on the tough and sometimes unforgiving city concrete in the urban streetscape of your choice. Here in New York City, I can’t go one year without seeing them being worn by many once the crisp weather kicks in.

 

Materials

 

Boot Material goes further than appearance – it’s about function, durability, occasion and what’s allowable depending on the forecast. Here we will cover the most common fall boot materials:

 

Leather

 

We recently published a leather jacket guide, and while we’re talking about boots, the same conversation about materials apply here. Leather is classic, durable and versatile. Polished calfskin works for formal boots, while full-grain or tumbled leather suits casual designs. Expect the same best practices for keeping leather jackets in great condition to apply here. Wear them proudly, but protect them from punctures and rips — you’ll feel the pain more than the leather. Shoe trees are my best friend to keep those creases at bay—creases will have everyone looking at them instead of admiring your fashion sense, especially here in the five boroughs.

 

Suede

 

There’s something regal about suede. It’s soft texture creates a more relaxed, but refined look. Working best with chukkas and Chelseas, especially in a fall hues like taupe, brown and navy, they’re perfect for both sunny and overcast fall days, but are not the go-to the moment the sky gives and H20 begins its descent. Protect them from the elements and you’ll wow onlookers every time you put them on your feet (as long as your ensemble looks great of course—we all can’t be Times Square’s naked cowboy).

 

Rubber

 

Typically used for soles, rubber provides traction and weather resistance. Full-rubber boots are more functional than stylish, but useful when weather becomes a challenge. Rainy days? Snow days? The proverbial Nor-easter? Rubber boots will be your go-to. Stylish options do exist. Knee-high wellington-style will always get the nod from me as they provide the best protection for your feet and pants and look great with formal outfits. For those looking for a lower profile, ankle and calf-high options exist. Rain boots in the Chelsea style are also fairly easy to come across. Unlike your grandpa’s department store, there are plenty of choices in this category here in the present.

 

 

Nylon

 

Lightweight and durable, nylon appears in tactical or hiking boots. It’s functional, but generally less stylish for dressy settings. You’ll find plenty of hybrids though—plenty of weather boots feature nylon tops with insulated lining along with rubber or polyurethane bottoms. Ugg boots come to mind. When you’re nearing the end of the season, these may end up in the front of your closet. You can check out our Winter Boot guide and upcoming Hiker’s Guide for more examples of nylon or nylon “hybrid: offerings.

 

 

Fall Colors

 

We have an upcoming article about the Fall Color Palette where we’ll do a deep dive, but we’ll keep it simple here. You already know that autumn is about rich, earthy tones. Boots are no exception.


Brown

 

The most versatile for casual and business casual wear. You can’t go wrong with brown. From Chelseas to Oxfords, brown just works.

 

Burgundy/Oxblood

How dramatic of a color name is “oxblood”? Lol. Striking in name or not, this color adds depth and pairs well with navy or gray. Remember those Eastlands I spoke about earlier? Their most popular hue was this color.

 

Tan

 

Another fall staple, though I’m cautious about what I pair this with. Best for casual fall outfits with denim or chinos, but I personally pair tan with lighter denim. If you have to wear dark colors (i.e. black pants and a black shirt), I’d be sure my outwear or accessory (i.e. hat or scarf) matches, or is a lighter color to add some overall contrast.

 

Black

 

Come on… Do we even need to discuss this? Black almost always works. It adds formality, sharpness and pairs well with suits, monochrome getups, casual outfits and anything in between. If not suede, then it’ll hide dirt and hold up the elements a bit better as a bonus. Add a bit of gloss (just a little bit) and you’re ready to a bit of class to any dress casual outfit. With black, you can’t (or rarely cant) go wrong.

 

Navy And Forest Green


For those looking for a bolder edge or to make a statement, these are worth looking into. For navy, tan chinos or corduroys will complement well. Black pants and a navy Henley or sweater would also work well. Forest green will require a bit more discernment with your ensemble choices. The proverbial green bomber or green trench with a brown scarf will complete the look.

 

 

Outfit Ideas

0 54
Wed Sep 30, 2026 08:55 PM
Why Shorter Men Should Be Wary Of The Manosphere

As we age, we generally aspire to find the meaning of life, the meaning of things, the meaning of norms, and why things are the way they are. From Greek philosophy to Pre-Roman Germanic, Native American to West African oral traditions to even monotheistic religious texts, you’ll find sayings, reasonings, fables, parables and cautionary tales. As we moved into the modern era, science, objective observation and record keeping have mostly taken their place, but used for the same reason, to help solve problems, prevent or prepare for disasters and to explain why things are the way they are. 

 

See Also: Top 25 Short CEOs, Business Leaders and Entrepreneurs

 

Throughout history, whether that knowledge came in the form of stories, traditions, observations or recorded facts, it was often the seasoned, the older and the experienced who passed it on to those coming up behind them, hoping to shape the next generation into carriers of their knowledge, values and customs.

INTRODUCTION

Let's pivot to another but related and decidedly more modern topic: the "Manosphere"... Oh boy. If there ever was a controversial corner of social media hyper-focused on dating, dating customs and gender dynamics, it's this loose network of self-proclaimed "experts" and modern-day newsbearers spread across countless platforms. Many have built enormous followings by presenting their conclusions as irrefutable truths, often built upon their own personal experiences, a handful of statistics that appear to reinforce those experiences—or assumptions—and then defending those conclusions with relentless conviction against anyone offering a different interpretation or additional context.


Women aren't quite off the hook either. While it isn't called the "Woman-O-Sphere," (yet anyway as of 2026), a complementary force absolutely exists across many of these same platforms. "Sprinkle, sprinkle" ring a bell? The "he needs to make $200K and be at least 6'2"" crowd? “The if he doesn’t send an Uber, there’ll be no date crowd?” Any of those tropes sound familiar? Between channels where the word "narcissist" gets thrown around so often it has practically lost all clinical meaning, and the proliferation of influencers promoting finessing your way into a "soft life" on forums and through videos alike as though it's an entitlement, you might say we have problems on both sides of the court.

Now before we move into the content, you might be giving me the side eye as you read this. You might even say that The Lower View is "Manosphere-Adjacent." That's a fair criticism. We do, in fact, engage in many of the same practices we've just identified. We cite studies, share our experiences and occasionally offer a bit of conjecture. However, what makes us different? For starters, we don't sell $10,000 courses. More importantly, our tagline is "A place where we discuss the experiences of shorter men." We welcome all viewpoints, from the single to the married, the widowed to the underemployed, all the way to the chairman of the board. Our site is open to everyone. We value the opinions of those who disagree with our assertions, and we always make it clear—or at least try to—that the perspectives and judgments expressed in our articles and comment sections belong to the individual writers and commenters themselves. I know you’re waiting for the discussion about the manosphere. We’ll get there, but I want to set it up first with a few anecdotes.

 

THE TALL OF IT

When I got my first job in college, one of my co-workers was a 6'4" guy. Many of the ladies loved interacting with him, and many of the guys wanted to hang around him. Every other week or so, however, someone in the workplace was absolutely livid with him. At first, I couldn't understand why. That changed after he and I had a verbal scuffle. It was a relatively minor disagreement, but his response was filled with vitriol and pointed insults. He carried himself as though he owned the place and was above everyone else. After that incident, I approached every future interaction with him cautiously.

As time went on, he instigated several more disputes with both me and other co-workers. One thing I couldn't help but notice, however, was his social genius. First, he never behaved that way around management. Second, he had an uncanny ability to navigate situations so that he never got caught. If someone confronted him or reported his behavior, there was always an alibi or a perfectly crafted explanation that his supervisors seemed eager to accept. It frustrated everyone to no end. His circle of admirers would eventually disappear one by one, but because it was retail and employees were constantly coming and going, every new hire would eventually fall under his spell for a while. I worked there for several years, and just before I graduated—roughly two years after I started—he finally received a verbal thrashing and a formal write-up from management. My question was always: what took so long?

There was another co-worker who stood nearly as tall as he did. Before he got married, some of his friends described him as quite the ladies' man. Then his wife cheated on him, and what followed was a brutal custody battle that cost him tens of thousands of dollars. By the end of it, he looked dead behind the eyes. Height, popularity and success in one area of life don't make someone immune to terrible circumstances, nor do they make them an authority on relationships, judgment or life itself.

There was yet another man who worked in there who stood at about 6’3 if I recall. Understand that in a lot of retail jobs, a large portion of the workers tend to be quite young, so there can be immaturity amongst the staff. Many of the female co-workers would gossip heavily about how “annoying” this 6’3 guy was. They would smile to his face and babble the moment he was 3 feet away. They would comment negatively on everything from his scent to his clothes to the way he talked. Just horrible stuff. As far as I knew, he was a pretty cool guy, but not to the ladies. They roasted him every chance they got. Who knows what they said about me when I wasn’t around!

Now, of course, these are anecdotes, and none of these situations represent the lives of all tall men. That's precisely the point. What I took away from those years in retail wasn't that tall men have it easy or hard. It was that being tall doesn't make someone infallible. Height, popularity, wisdom and success are all different things, and possessing one doesn't guarantee the others. Likewise, having a trait that much of today's social media culture treats as “coveted" doesn't make someone an authority on relationships, judgment or life itself.

With that fairly long introduction (apologies!), I want to discuss, without further delay, why shorter men in particular need to be wary of the general manosphere.”

 

ENTER THE SPHERE

The first time I encountered the word "Manosphere" was around 2014. Back then, it was largely a loose network of blogs that were hyper-critical of women. The common thread was hard to miss: "all women are...", "all women must...". You get the idea. Many of the articles and comment sections were filled with resentment, and some comments bordered on outright cruelty. Eventually, many of those same ideas made their way to YouTube, where creators adopted a similar formula but reached much larger audiences.

One of the first creators in this space I came across was a guy named Richard Cooper. An entrepreneur who apparently found considerable success in business, Cooper often spoke about his divorce and used those experiences to warn other men—frequently from behind the wheel of his car. Cooper, who has self-reported as 6'4", was known for phrases like, "Women wait at the finish line and pick the winners." Divorce, family court and child support became recurring themes in much of the content I was exposed to.

Later in the decade, creators began investing heavily in professional cameras, lighting, microphones and studio setups, often spending thousands of dollars to increase the quality of their productions. The presentation became slicker, the audiences became larger, and the influence grew with them. One team in particular that exploded in popularity was Fresh and Fit. We're going to land here for a bit because their trajectory—and their constant appearance in headlines—was one of the motivations behind writing this article.

Myron Gaines (Fresh, né Amrou Fudl) and Fit (né Walter Weekes, a.k.a Fresh Prince CEO) purport themselves to be “high-value men”. Similar to Cooper, they are also hypercritical of women, spend most of their time discussing hypergamy, and teach men how to level up in the face of their supposed laser-focused intentional social climbing female counterparts. Unlike Cooper, they regularly invite women on their show (who they stylize as “girls”) and aim to destroy their egos and denigrate them at every opportunity, even when some agree to appear in “good faith” (truth be told, many who appear do so to increase their own social media following, but that is not the focus of this article). Okay, you get it. But Myron, who stands at 6’3 was caught in two major scandals (many more than that, but two that are worth discussing) in the last couple of years. The first involved him contacting a model and then telling her that she would be doing herself a “favor” by getting intimate with him” (she made it clear she wasn’t interested and leaked the text), and the other more recently where his supposed “long-term” girlfriend left him for a man she met at a rollerblade event one weekend.

Donavan Sharpe, another manosphere creator, who found his fame in the years leading up to the explosion of Fresh & Fit, spent years warning men about single mothers and instructing men to speak to women harshly, with directives and constantly referred to them as “sl-ts”. After some of his detractors did some digging, they discovered that his girlfriend was in fact… a single mother. He later went on to marry her in a very unconventional marriage ceremony. Donavan stands at 6’1. The man who preached the importance of being fit, became the very opposite of fit”. Yeah… “high-value” … Lol.

Now the aim here isn’t to be superficial. The aim isn’t to disparage or assault their character. Rather, to point out the contradictions and revelations. There are so many more examples. Coach Red Pill, who passed away in 2025 had a similar format to Cooper who we described earlier, but went further with even harsher rhetoric and racist rants. He stood at 6 feet. Then there’s Sneako, a character standing at 6’2 who has been outright banned from Australia. You have Andrew Tate, a former kickboxing champion who had his comeuppance in the space in the early 2020s. He has faced criminal investigations and charges related to human trafficking and other allegations. These are “High-Value Men”? All are well above six feet, at some point made well over six figures, and at some point, were in great shape (the third six: a “six pack”). Based on the facts, these men struggled with some or all—greed, the ladies, the law, discipline, money, self-respect and insecurity. Aren’t these the attributes that society tells you a shorter guy supposedly lack? Not I, and not many that I know. This is not to say that they struggle because they’re tall, we’re not making blanket statements here, but rather that just because you’re tall does NOT mean that you’ll have all of these things in the bag. Just because you are short, does not mean that all of these things are unattainable.

 

See Also: If You're A Shorter Man, Both Political Parties Hate You

 

BUT WAIT, THERE'S MORE

This brings me to Aba Atlas of the YouTube-famous duo “Aba and Preach.” Aba is of particular interest to me in this article because some of his early success was due, in part, to a video about heightism—a video that, to my estimation, became his first million-view video, at least the first one I can recall, helping propel the duo to the forefront of popular online culture during the mid-2010s, specifically in 2016.

In the video, titled “The Hypocrisy of Women Not Wanting to Date Short Men,” Aba criticized what he saw as a double standard: women could be highly critical of men's preferences regarding certain body types, behavioral traits and chastity, yet some would absolutely destroy men over the subject of height. His point was that height criticism could roll off the tongue so casually and without awareness that the person delivering it was committing the very kind of superficial judgment they might otherwise criticize in men.

I remember scrolling through the thousands of comments, many of which cheered Aba on for being bold enough to challenge the prevailing social discourse. What particularly stood out to me was Aba's pinned comment at the time, in which he insisted that criticism of the video wouldn't affect him personally because he was 6 feet tall.

The exact comment read:

“FYI I’m 6 feet tall so I’m not a manlet. I’m only stating my height because folks seem to believe I made this video because I’m ‘butthurt’. Far from it, I honestly don’t feel strongly about this issue I’m just [a] curious dude who likes to poke fun at shit.”

[Corrections made for grammar in his original comment.]

Well, well, well.

Fast-forward ten years, and Aba himself found himself in a pot of scalding water when several women accused him of having unprotected relations with them, subsequently getting them pregnant and then asking them to terminate the pregnancies. The accusations began emerging one after another.

Many of Aba's fans had come to appreciate what they viewed as his level-headed approach and relatively bias-free, “high-IQ” commentary. Others frequently praised his apparent support for women and his understanding of the importance of recognizing their emotional states and allowing them to process their circumstances in their own way.

Aba addressed the accusations in several videos, where he acknowledged and poked fun at his own irresponsibility when it came to using protection. Many of his detractors—including Myron Gaines of Fresh & Fit, whom we discussed earlier—used the opportunity to go scorched-earth on Aba, accusing him of hypocrisy for criticizing manosphere creators for their openly polygamous approach to dating while allegedly enjoying quite a variety of women behind closed doors.

My point here is that Aba, whom I and many others came to appreciate for his “high-EQ” commentary, is not immune to the same contradictions and poor decisions that he has criticized in others.

Going back to his pinned comment about his own height, there is something particularly interesting in retrospect. Aba wasn't merely aware of the double standard surrounding height; he was also explicitly aware of his own advantage within that dynamic. That doesn't make him responsible for the choices he later made, nor does it mean his height caused any of them. But it does illustrate an important point: understanding a social dynamic intellectually doesn't necessarily make you immune to participating in it yourself.

Consider the super-tall 6'5" YouTube creator Derrick Jackson, who heavily criticized men, developed a large and loyal female following, and was later exposed for cheating on his wife with multiple women. Aba took pleasure in chastising Jackson once the news of his multiple affairs became public.

Yet the two men weren't as different as their respective public personas might suggest. Both were tall men who understood the advantages that could come with physical appearance and social popularity. Neither, however, was immune to making serious personal mistakes.

That's really the point.

The argument isn't that Aba—or Derrick Jackson, for that matter—is a bad person because of what happened. Nor is it that their height somehow caused their behavior. It's that physical advantages, social advantages and even intellectual insight into human behavior don't make anyone immune to contradiction, temptation or poor judgment.

And that is precisely why shorter men should be careful about treating anyone in the manosphere—or anywhere else—as an unquestionable authority on how to navigate life.

 

See Also: Comebacks For Short Jokes

 

OUT AND ABOUT

On any given day here in New York City, Bushwick, Brooklyn in particular, I can walk down Broadway under the Jamaica Avenue El (The iconic J, M and Z subway lines for those who aren’t familiar) and see tons of men (and women) who are struggling with addiction, nodding off while standing up or lying on the ground. Many more are struggling with housing insecurity and their finances. On social media, in various Facebook groups, you can see men, many of them tall (you can tell from profile photos) nervously posting about unpaid child support, custody situations, what seems to be impossible debt, job insecurity and a mountain of other issues. This is not to say that shorter men do not have any of the same struggles, but from a bird’s eye view, it seems evenly distributed.

Now, I say this not to brag. I promise you that. My life is far from perfect, but I do have a great job, live in a decent place and am living in indisputable peace. I have plenty of friends, had a pretty eventful dating life, continue to date and have not had to deal with all of the issues that our Manosphere brutes have had to endure. I have a great family, travel, have hobbies and do most of the things that others do for their own satisfaction. Many shorter guys on various online forums report the same, even those who (rightfully) complain about the downsides of being on the shorter side. While being taller would be nice because of the added social benefits, being short does not preclude us from attaining social positives and important life milestones. For some things, they may possibly be harder depending on your other attributes, but again, not necessarily impossible. In other words, the main thing one gains from being tall is not being called or dealing with the stigma of being short. It does not prevent us from living an otherwise fulfilling life. The famous Robert Reich (former Secretary Of Labor under President Clinton, 1993-1997 who stands at four foot eleven inches) once said on an episode of ABC 20/20, “don’t let being short stop you”. And you shouldn’t let it. Being a “high value man” shouldn’t in my opinion be your goal. Being in a place where you are doing things you are passionate about (for work and play), respected by others for the value you bring (relationships, the workplace, family, hobbies) are what will make people value you highly.

 

Advertise With The Lower View And Reach 100,000+ Per Month!

 

CONCLUSION

The internet is full of people eager to tell you why your life isn't good enough and what you need to buy, become, or believe to fix it. As a shorter man, you'll hear plenty of voices telling you that height is your biggest obstacle. My experience has taught me something different. Height may shape some experiences, but it doesn't define your character, your relationships, your accomplishments, or your capacity to live a meaningful life. Choose your mentors carefully—not because of how tall they stand, but because of how well they stand up to scrutiny.

So what are your thoughts on the Manosphere? Wish to challenge our thoughts? Bring it! We welcome it! Chat about it on our forums here... at The Lower View!

 

Like This Article? Chat About It And More On Our Forum For Shorter Men!

0 227
Thu Aug 27, 2026 08:00 PM
Summer Wardrobe Essentials For Shorter Men

Summer Wardrobe Essentials For Shorter Men

0 315
Fri Jul 31, 2026 09:00 PM
Just Date Shorter Women They Say....

"Lot's of shorter women out there for shorter guys!".

Go figure...

0 390
Sun Jul 12, 2026 06:06 AM
Polo Shirt Fashion Guide For Shorter Men

Polo Shirt Fashion Guide For Shorter Men

0 360
Tue Jun 30, 2026 09:13 PM